Feminism-or-How to Learn to Hate Women in Three Easy Steps

Mothers, have you ever sat back and wondered,”How do I raise my son to not be a rapist?”
Probably not, because you’re a decent human being who cares for your children and you’re smart enough to just assume that if you raise them lovingly and teach them good values mixed with some self-respect you won’t have to worry about that.
For all the rest of you (who shall henceforth be flippantly designated as “Mother of the Year candidates”), Miss GlossWitch has written an article to help you out. The answer, of course, is feminism.
So feminism will teach men to not hate women and be rapists? Even though it’s feminism that implicates………..huh?
Trust me. This gets better.
“In recent years specific guidance on raising boys has sprung up as an awkward counterpart to feminist activism. Positioned as a response to “masculinity in crisis” it seeks not to be anti-feminist, but to even up the balance sheet. Feminism for the girls, confidence-boosting for the boys. Who could argue with that?”
How about just confidence-boosting for girls as well? Feminism really does nothing but tell girls how weak and useless they are. It seems to me that if you gave confidence-boosting to the girls then feminism would no longer be…..oh, nevermind.
“As a feminist, I’ve never felt comfortable with this. It always feels like a thinly-veiled apology to the men of tomorrow for the fact that things won’t be as good as in the old days, back when women knew their place.”
Yeah, back in the good old days. When a man worked ten hour days doing heavy labour or spending long hours wage-slaving to support a woman who stayed at home all day with the kids. Getting bent backs and health problems that sent them cart-wheeling into early graves. Guys are just lining up by the millions to go back to that.
Look I can understand how women might not have been happy with the arrangements they had, but can we at least come to an agreement that it wasn’t exactly a picnic for those humans who happened to have a penis either? It’s almost as though nearly everybody has to deal with having a shitty lot in life. Though strangely for some reason only women get to bitch about it.
So here’s where we start hitting gold.
“As the mother of boys I know I’m expected to supress my resentment and get on board with the next pro-masculinity project, hoping that it will make my children into strong, confident men (or at least ones who don’t resent me for being too much of a harpy). I’m expected to wring my hands about their self-esteem and to panic about girls “stealing” all the A*s and university places.”
Yeah imagine that. As a mother people naturally assume that you’re going to care about the well being and self-esteem of your children. A shocking and unexpected revelation I know. Seriously? “I’m expected”. It’s not even an expectation, it’s simply a facet of basic humanity that you care for fucks sakes!
I must admit that I find it very disturbing how she phrases this as though it is some form of unreasonable burden being placed on her.
“I’m meant to worry about them disliking themselves, not about whether they will also learn to dislike women. I’m supposed to assume, glibly, that as long as they are content and fulfilled, they will not become misogynists, however filled with hate the air that they breathe. I simply don’t believe this. I watch the pro-boys movement, tracking feminist progress and launching one bad-faith countermove after another, and I know it will not spare my sons the misery of hating.”
I am attempting to find a means of putting into words how horrible this truly sounds to me, but there are so many ways in which this disturbs me that it’s hard to limit it to one or two. Firstly there is the disregard for the welfare of her own sons that she shows in these two statements. Placing their mental well-being and happiness as a lesser priority to whether or not they feel appropriately about women (I wonder if she would expect any daughters to do the same for men). Secondly there is the underlying assumption implicit in her words that hating women is the default for her children. Thirdly is that she seems to view this as some form of either/or scenario. Glosswitch says that she is meant to worry about her sons hating themselves, not whether they hate women. Does she not comprehend that one does not necessarily rule out the other? It is entirely possible to simply teach her sons not to hate themselves, women, or anyone else.
Truly. Some parents have actually accomplished that, I hear.
So what then, might I ask, will help to spare your sons the “misery of hating”?
Only feminism can do that.
Of course/of course.
Very well, I’ll take the bait this time around. Miss Glosswitch, will you please tell us exactly what you teach your boys about themselves from a feminist perspective.
I’m guessing it involves something about male babies consuming the blood of slain women.
The last babysitter we had for Tommy just didn't work out. Hmmm? Oh don't worry about the mess it's all right just ummm, don't turn your back on him ok?

The last babysitter we had for Tommy just didn’t work out. Hmmm? Oh don’t worry about the mess. It’s all right just ummm, don’t turn your back on him ok?

“However grateful women may feel that men are being helped to adjust to “equality”, what other social justice movement is expected to validate a counterpart “poor you” movement on behalf of the oppressor class? Isn’t it just typical? Can’t women and girls have anything for themselves?”
WTF??? I-I-I-I
Allow me, take a moment to compose yourself.
Miss Glosswitch, I have to ask. What oppressor class, where?
By “oppressor class” I can only assume that you mean men. So I can only draw from this that you believe that all or most men beat, abuse, or behave cruelly towards women. As that is the only way that this “oppressor class” could exist. That being the case why are women not in the kitchen chained up? If men are an oppressor class and society is oppressive to women then how can feminism even exist in the first place? Usually ending oppression takes a significant amount of violence, as one needs to defeat the powerful class first and they rarely go quietly so long as they have the power. All feminists really do is stomp around and complain about things, and they seem to be very good at getting whatever it is they want with (comparatively) little effort and time expended. So how do you explain this if women are oppressed and powerless. I would truly like to know.
You see Ms. Glosswitch, this is an example of oppression. Or this.
Newark
This is an image from the Newark race riots which were sparked after John Weerd Smith was arrested for a traffic stop and mysteriously ended up in the hospital. The National Guard was called in to deal with the violence that erupted and lasted 6 days, caused 700 injuries and killed 26 people.
This is what oppression looks like when you have an oppressor and oppressed class. It does not look a bunch of middle class women complaining on the internet that some male somewhere on someday just happened to look at her tata’s as opposed to her eyes.
By trying to apply this to yourself and your kind all you do is trivialize the truly oppressed. It is sickening.
And here I thought I did the moral outrage thing.
What exactly does she mean by “can’t women have anything to themselves?” Feminists set up their own internet sites, their own conferences for women, charities, scholarships, etc. There are women only schools, gyms, clubs, shelters, and magazines. Yeah, I can see what you mean sweetheart, it’s a pain in the ass when idiots with a gender agenda come barging into your places and your favourite pastimes  demanding to be accommodated. Isn’t it?
” When misogyny is naked and extreme, in men such as Peter Sutcliffe, Marc Lépine, Anders Breivik or Elliot Rodger, we’re quick to position it as an aberration but we know that it is not.”
Excuse me? Elliot Rodger? Just a-
Wait a second. It’s going to get better trust me on this.
“One of the double-binds that misogyny creates for women is that calling it out – actually saying “this culture hates women” – will lead to accusations that one is irrational, hysterical and unable to see nuance.”
In the interests of brevity we’re not going to go into great detail on this. Instead we will post an upcoming video on our youtube channel in a few days that will deal with this part. However, to make this quick.
Anders Breivik was a terrorist who bombed government buildings and a summer camp run by the Norweigan Labour Party in order to further his right-wing, anti-islamic, populist, ultranationalist, culturally conservative, paramilitary agenda. He does blame feminism as well for what he feels is the decline of society though at no point does he blame women. Apparently Miss Glosswitch believes that feminism is equivalent to all women; which goes without saying, I suppose. However his complaints about feminism were little more than an afterthought and his goal is clearly one of race and culture. He killed 77 people and injured hundreds of others, mostly men.
Elliot Rodger was a lunatic who killed four men and two women in a shooting spree. A man who left a manifesto detailing his hatred for every other human being on the planet.
Lépine was a crazed gunman who shot 14 women in a Montreal school because, claiming that he was fighting feminism. Misogynist? Probably a safe bet.
Peter Sutcliff was a serial killer who murdered prostitutes. While clearly disturbed there’s no real indication that he hated women per se, merely that he had a hatred for women in the worlds oldest profession.
Here’s the issue with this. She is doing what many feminists seem to want to do now these days. She is labeling any form of sensationalistic crime that might possibly have something to do with women a case of obvious misogyny. They are attempting to co-opt every possible tragedy and turn it into a victimhood party. A bomber who kills 77 people due to extreme xenophobia and nationalism is somehow an example of extreme misogyny just because he mentioned feminism once.
If this is not an aberration, as she claims it isn’t, then why is it so relatively uncommon? If this were normal, as she attempts to claim, then we’d be seeing people cutting up women left and right without batting a social eye. So why are men still far more likely to die of violence than women? Where is all of this extreme hatred of women that is everywhere and omnipresent? Surely she could have named better examples than the ones she did list if what she was saying were true? Why is it that out of your examples, two of them did not hate women in general, but feminism specifically?
Glosswitch claims that when she calls out misogyny there are accusation of being irrational, hysterical, and unable to see nuance. Yeah, I wonder why.
“Steve Biddulph’s Raising Boys has long been held up as a lifesaver for mothers trying to raise confident boys in the face of feminism’s monstrous regiments. Scratch beneath the surface and what it really offers is an entrenchment of male entitlement, albeit with touchy-feely justifications. It positions itself as distinct from men’s rights extremism but lies on the same continuum. It is snide and sneaky, suggesting to mothers that if their little boys are allowed to “feel good about themselves” then they can’t possibly grow up to hate women. As ever, women bear the greatest responsibility for men not despising them. Funny, that.”
Funny how? Children are generally raised  by their mothers. Most teachers, daycare workers, and child workers are women. Almost every person directly responsible for how a child grows up and views the world will be a woman. That’s why they have that saying about “the hand that rocks the cradle”, remember that? That’s how you wanted it. You guys called it the Tender Years Doctrine.  Let me take a moment to quote Caroline Norton:
How many worthy and celebrated men
have asserted that they owed all they were, to that
earliest and holiest guidance ! How many men
who have passed a dissipated and profligate youth,
have declared that the first impressions given in
childhood returned to them afterwards, and that
the precepts which cheered their declining lives,
were those which a mother’s voice repeated to
them in infancy !
It was feminist fugheads like you who insisted upon giving women the responsibility of raising children and teaching them about the world. So yeah, I think it is just a little fair to expect women to have the responsibility of teaching men why they shouldn’t hate them. Because if men are growing up to collectively hate women, maybe it has something to do with the way women are actually raising them. Lépines mother believed that his own hatred of women stemmed from her parental neglect of him due to her focus on building her career, combined with continued mistreatment from his sister. It’s almost like if you grow up as a child and all the examples of a group you meet are shitty people you might actually start to believe that all members of that group are shitty people.
Look, you feminists appointed women as the caretakers of children. Then you told those women to go out and have careers and work all day,leaving behind the children that you told them to take care of. Then you attempt to raise a generation of self-entitled, spiteful, raging narcissists, all the while telling the boys that they’re supposed to spend all of their time looking after and caring for these girls that tell them they’re as unneeded as a fish needs a bicycle. That they’re rapists, that their self-esteem does not matter, that misogyny is normalized and all their fault, serial killers like Sutcliff are common behaviour, etc.
Gee, I can’t understand for one FUCKING minute why some of them might grow up hating women.
Funny, that.
“Men do not need nice, kind, understanding women to help them realise their own humanity.”
WTF??Their humanity? You’re the one saying that mens wants and needs are only relevant in so far as they relate back to women.
“Biddulph may claim that “the antidote to ‘creepiness’ is an infusion of warmth, humour and openness” but it has to be more than that. Men need to recognise that women are human simply because we are – not as an endorsement of their own humanity. “
In other words you want to raise young boys to treat women as human, but you are not going to require that women actually treat men as human in return. Apparently it is perfectly all right to use, abuse , and show no respect or kindness to males. This view of humanity and human relations is very clearly based on nothing more than solipsism. As my opposite said, boys needs only matter insofar as they relate back to girls. We’re giving to you the shortened version of her article but this is a common theme throughout all of it. There is no point in this article where she treats men in general, or young boys in specific, as human beings in any way. They are tools. Not human beings who need love and affection from the people who’s job it is to nurture them.
Hey pal, if they can’t learn to love the women that emotionally starve and abuse them, it’s a failing of them as a man. Don’t blame women for all society’s ills. Women are never responsible for anything.
I sincerely feel sorry for her sons and if I were religious I would pray nightly that her children would be taken away and placed in a better environment because this women is clearly toxic.
“It is feminism that offers a release from this dependency.”
Of course/of course.
”Only feminism can stop my sons growing up to hate women”
Then that just goes to show what a shitty excuse for a parent you are. Most normal parents have no problem teaching their kids not to hate anyone. Not just women, but not hating anyone. Maybe you should be revising your own parenting skills if you can’t keep your own children from growing up to hate your entire segment of humanity. And if you’re more worried about your boys hating women than you are about them growing up to hate themselves maybe you should shove a dipstick up your ass and check your humanity levels because they seem to be slipping.
“I know this will sound ideological and one-sided to some.”
You think?/Ya think?
” I don’t actually care.”
That is very good to hear, because we don’t care either. You are a poisonous woman, one who should never be allowed to have any manner of child, male or female. I am unsure as to how you can even call yourself human at this point. If you truly wish to prevent your boys from growing up to hate women then don’t raise them to be feminists, raise them to be anything but. Simply show them love and kindness and teach them about the humanity of all people. You are their mother and, like it or not, you and other women will be the ones they are most exposed to in their formative years. You are the ones who will teach them about society and shape their views. So I implore you to not teach them about feminism. It will solve a lot of problems for everyone.
twittergoogle_plusyoutube
Tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *